eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks: related news

eBay Beats Tiffany In Net Trademark Case

sm62704 notes a Reuters story reporting that eBay has beat Tiffany in court in a "knockout" decision. If this had gone the other way, not only would eBay be in trouble (especially after the loss of a similar case in France), but so would Net commerce as a whole. Tiffany seems certain to appeal. "All of Tiffany's trademark infringement claims against eBay were rejected — a knockout blow to the four-year-old lawsuit that had been closely watched by Internet companies as well as luxury goods makers seeking to stop the sale of counterfeit products online. Tiffany & Co had alleged that eBay turned a blind eye to the sale of fake Tiffany silver jewelry on its site. EBay had countered that it was not in a position to determine which goods were knock-offs.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

A judge said Monday that companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay. Tiffany had sued eBay over the sale of counterfeit jewelry on eBay's sites.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

A judge said Monday that companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay. Tiffany had sued eBay over the sale of counterfeit jewelry on eBay’s sites.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

A judge said Monday that companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay. Tiffany had sued eBay over the sale of counterfeit jewelry on eBay's sites.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

A judge said Monday that companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay. Tiffany had sued eBay over the sale of counterfeit jewelry on eBay's sites.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

A judge said Monday that companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay. Tiffany had sued eBay over the sale of counterfeit jewelry on eBay's sites.

Tiffany appeals ruling eBay won over fakes

Tiffany & Co. challenged yesterday a federal ruling that largely absolved eBay Inc. of policing its auction site for counterfeit items, saying the judge was wrong to leave the primary burden to the jewellery maker. The appeal with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York extends a case that Tiffany filed against eBay in 2004 arguing that most items listed for sale on eBay as genuine Tiffany products were fakes. Last month, a judge ruled that trademark holders like the jewellery maker, rather than auction platforms like eBay, are responsible for policing their brands online. Tiffany lawyer James Swire said yesterday that trademark law doesn't put the responsibility on Tiffany for policing its own trademark. "The judge's entire analysis of what is Tiffany's responsibility with respect to the site versus eBay's starts from an incorr

Tiffany appeals ruling eBay won over fakes

Tiffany & Co. challenged yesterday a federal ruling that largely absolved eBay Inc. of policing its auction site for counterfeit items, saying the judge was wrong to leave the primary burden to the jewellery maker. The appeal with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York extends a case that Tiffany filed against eBay in 2004 arguing that most items listed for sale on eBay as genuine Tiffany products were fakes. Last month, a judge ruled that trademark holders like the jewellery maker, rather than auction platforms like eBay, are responsible for policing their brands online. Tiffany lawyer James Swire said yesterday that trademark law doesn't put the responsibility on Tiffany for policing its own trademark. "The judge's entire analysis of what is Tiffany's responsibility with respect to the site versus eBay's starts from an incorr

Tiffany appeals ruling eBay won over fakes

Tiffany & Co. challenged yesterday a federal ruling that largely absolved eBay Inc. of policing its auction site for counterfeit items, saying the judge was wrong to leave the primary burden to the jewellery maker. The appeal with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York extends a case that Tiffany filed against eBay in 2004 arguing that most items listed for sale on eBay as genuine Tiffany products were fakes. Last month, a judge ruled that trademark holders like the jewellery maker, rather than auction platforms like eBay, are responsible for policing their brands online. Tiffany lawyer James Swire said yesterday that trademark law doesn't put the responsibility on Tiffany for policing its own trademark. "The judge's entire analysis of what is Tiffany's responsibility with respect to the site versus eBay's starts from an incorr

eBay claims court victory in Belgium over L'Oreal in counterfeit goods case

Online auctioneer eBay claimed yesterday to have won a Belgian court case against L'Oreal after the French cosmetics giant sued it over the sale of counterfeit goods. L'Oreal has brought cases against eBay in five European nations, including Belgium, accusing the company of not doing enough to prevent the sale of counterfeit goods posted on its auction and sale sites. The Belgian commercial court, the first jurisdiction to deliver a ruling, "has ruled in favour of eBay," said Sravanthi Agrawal, eBay spokeswoman in Europe. The court ruled that the world's largest online auctioneer did not have "a general monitoring obligation" of what was on offer on its site. "The judge confirmed that eBay acted diligently when it received letters from L'Oreal," the spokeswoman added.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

EBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

NEW YORK - EBay scored an important victory in court today, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

(AP) -- EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

NEW YORK (AP) - EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks [XFNA]

NEW YORK (AP) - EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

NEW YORK (AP) -- EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.

eBay Inc. Applauds Court's Rejection of Tiffany Counterfeit Claims

SAN JOSE, Calif., BUSINESS WIRE -- eBay Inc. (Nasdaq:EBAY)(www.ebay.com) today praised a federal judge's ruling in the Tiffany vs. eBay trademark case, affirming the company's leading efforts to fight counterfeits and to support consumer choice to buy and sell authentic merchandise online. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York also declared that eBay takes appropriate steps to remove suspected counterfeit listings as part of the company's additional efforts to provide a safe and trusted marketplace. Furthermore, the court also found that Tiffany was responsible for policing its own trademark on eBay.

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks

NEW YORK (AP) _ EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany &

eBay beats Tiffany in court case over trademarks (AP)

scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like

eBay Must Ban LVMH Designer Items

The LVMH Group issued a press release on Friday announcing the Paris Court of Appeal's decision to confirm the charges against eBay of the Paris Commercial Court. The French Commercial Court had ordered eBay to pay almost 40 million euros to LVMH for "negligence" and "illicit sales" over the sale of counterfeit goods on its online auction site. Through an injunction, the court also ordered eBay to cease selling perfumes and cosmetics bearing the Dior, Guerlain, Givenchy and Kenzo brand names, failing which eBay would incur penalty payments of Euro 50,000 per day. The Commercial Court had also ruled that eBay should prevent its members from using those brand names.

Judge rules for eBay on fake jewellery

US-based online auction services provider eBay has had an important legal win in a court case involving fake jewellery. District Court of New York judge Richard Sullivan has found that claimant Tiffany was wrong to put the onus for policing the trade in counterfeit goods on eBay, and noted that auctions for fake jewellery were cancelled immediately when Tiffany alerted eBay to them. The legal team for the luxury goods brand has signalled an appeal may be lodged. eBay had previously lost in a similar matter, when a French court ruled in favour of LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton and ordered compensation of in excess of $US61m be paid to it by eBay

Ebay Wins Tiffany Trademark Case

A judge said Monday that companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay. Tiffany had sued eBay over the sale of counterfeit jewelry on eBay's sites.

Search took 0.59 seconds.